<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agility and Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/</link>
	<description>Dale Emery on Leadership</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Matts</title>
		<link>http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Matts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/05/agile-2/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I agree.

Even though they are secondary values, sometimes they have value. Sometimes Agilist think that "over" means instead of and as a result do no planning. Some planning is necessary especially on large projects when funding needs to be secured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
<p>Even though they are secondary values, sometimes they have value. Sometimes Agilist think that &#8220;over&#8221; means instead of and as a result do no planning. Some planning is necessary especially on large projects when funding needs to be secured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Francis</title>
		<link>http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/05/agile-2/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I love this.

Thanks, as always, Dale for yet another valuable insight.

A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this.</p>
<p>Thanks, as always, Dale for yet another valuable insight.</p>
<p>A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent Bossavit</title>
		<link>http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent Bossavit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/05/agile-2/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I like this a lot - it has great potential. As I reflected on this I was reminded of the diagrams I've seen from the TOC people - "Reality Tree" diagrams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this a lot - it has great potential. As I reflected on this I was reminded of the diagrams I&#8217;ve seen from the TOC people - &#8220;Reality Tree&#8221; diagrams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/agile-2/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>David Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwd.dhemery.com/2004/06/05/agile-2/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Can we take this thread further and suggest that measurements should be made against the items on the left and not the items on the right (as they only serve those on the left)?

Hence, is the essence of a core manifesto for agile management (as opposed to leadership) that the management metrics reflect the achievement of the items on the left of the manifesto?

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we take this thread further and suggest that measurements should be made against the items on the left and not the items on the right (as they only serve those on the left)?</p>
<p>Hence, is the essence of a core manifesto for agile management (as opposed to leadership) that the management metrics reflect the achievement of the items on the left of the manifesto?</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
